Hi,
At 01.10 27/01/2003, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
The auth fixes is waiting for you to bring them into CVS when you are
happy with their state.
Lets try to keep the PRE cycle of 3.0 relatively short. Do not go into
PRE unless you seriously expect that there won't be any more major
changes or additions before STABLE.
I have not paid close attention to 3.0 yet due to various reasons
(kind of stuck in 2.5 at the moment) so I cannot say I have much of a
opinion what 3.0.STABLE should have or what may be missing. I can
however offer to bring over some of the basic aspects of rproxy to
allow for more sane reverse proxy setups if wanted
rproxy detail:
* http[s]_port options for "originserver" mode operations
* cache_peer relations to origin servers
Regards
Henrik
And what about merging Windows port and the new Robert's IPC code ?
Regards
Guido
On Friday 24 January 2003 10.58, Robert Collins wrote:
> What's missing to start a release cycle for squid 3.0? The ESI work
> needs some tweaking before further merges to HEAD.
>
> The 2.5 Stable 2 auth fixes I'll bring across to 3.0 as and when
> they go into CVS.
>
> So...... thoughts?
>
> Rob
-
=======================================================
Serassio Guido
Via Albenga, 11/4 10134 - Torino - ITALY
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.serassio.it
