On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 10:05, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: ... > The rproxy merge backs out some of the minor request parsing refactoring > you had done, and some of this should probably be redone. > > Also, there is some parts of the code (http_port/https_port) which > really SHOULD be rewritten to use classes with inheritance.. bastard C > code at the moment. > > The code is temporarily in the rproxy branch while testing as I am not > entirely sure if this refactoring should be done before committing to > HEAD or after..
I'd rather we reintroduce the request parsing refactoring in the branch, than reverse and reintroduce it in HEAD> As for http_port / https_port - if it works, then we can always refactor next time someone needs to tweak the code :}. I've nearly finished the ACL work I have time for - the next merge (which doesn't interfere with rproxy from what you indicated) will make it all come together :}. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
