My take: Should be ACL driven.
To be ACL driven an ACL which matches hit/miss/near_hit etc needs to be added. i.e. similar to tcp_outgoing_tos, but with the addition of a new acl type which can match if it is a hit/miss. Regards Henrik tor 2003-03-27 klockan 12.08 skrev Daniel Draper: > I'm interested to know peoples opinions. In regards to HIT/MISS packet > marking I figure it might be a good idea to make it an option in the > squid.conf file. Perhaps under the miscellaneous section and defined > something like: > > mark_client_packets <miss_mark> <hit_mark> > > miss_mark is the number between 0 and 16 that the packet is marked with > in the event of a cache miss and hit_mark is that of a cache hit. > > If the directive is not present in the config file then packets are not > marked. I can't think of any reasons straight away but perhaps some > people might not want packet marking on their cache. Maybe QoS > algorithms? > > Also, the ToS marks may need to be even valued only I think because of > the organization of the bits in the IP-Header. Can anyone clarify this? > > Cheers, > > Daniel -- Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MARA Systems AB, Sweden
