On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 18:12, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Friday 18 July 2003 02.13, Duane Wessels wrote: > > > Okay. There is already a call to increment disk.unlinks in > > aiops.c, so if it is unsafe I guess it should be removed. > > Indeed. > > If you want to have counters in aufs then store_io_aufs or async_io is > good places to add them. Both are threads safe as opposed to aiops.c. > Pick the one which makes the counting most unified among the storeio > implementations.
Oh, and in 3.0 there are already said counters in aufs... Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
