On Monday 04 August 2003 23.50, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Monday 04 August 2003 19.31, Duane Wessels wrote: > > It seems wrong to me that MAGIC1 is proportional to the SQUARE of > > the number of cache_dir's. I could even argue that it should > > be logarithmic since performance doesn't really scale linearly > > with #disks or cache_dirs. > > Indeed. > > > Also I would suggest that these calculations use the number > > of AUFS cache_dirs, which might be less than the total number. > > Kind of hard to put that in a #define though.
What do you think of the patch in Bug #732? Regards Henrik
