On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Gerard Eviston wrote: > Any reason why a docbook FAQ might be a bad idea? Advice from others that have > been down this road would be much appreciated.
I don't care either way. docbook is more flexible but at the same time a little more strict than linuxdoc however.. (linuxdoc is very forgiving, or at least I find so) I do however find the "linear/chapter" structure of the FAQ being a book a little struggling. It is sometimes very hard to tell exacly where a question belongs, and often it belongs little here little there.. For easier maintenance it would be beneficial if FAQ entries was simply collected "in a bag" and then sorted based on keywords etc into chapters, iwth the same question possibly linked at more than one place. But I am far from an SGML/XML expert to tell if this can easily be done without using a intermediary storage format. Ideas welcome. Does anyone know of other projects trying to have a FAQ as large as ours? Maybe good advices on what to do (or not) can be found there. > Consider this also a call for fellow volunteers. There is at least one user who just have got started updating the FAQ content. Dodjie Nava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. You may want to keep him in the loop. My main interest is more on the level of having correct information in the FAQ. I do not really care what format it is written in, how it gets there etc. Regards Henrik
