On Tue, Feb 24, 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Robert Collins wrote: > > > FWIW mem_node existed before I did anything, but was linked lists not > > splays. > > Right, it is the low end storage for the mem object. Was a linked list as > it always was linear and most often quite small with one reader and one > writer. > > Adrian, have you fiddled with the read ahead window size or otherwise > allowing very large objects in cache_mem? > > In addition, is the requests send by the client plain GET requests or are > ranges involved?
Absolutely no idea. It wasn't a core, so I didn't save it. I'll see if I can re-fiddle things to make it happen again. No, I haven't fiddled with anything save that patch. Adrian
