On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Ok. I'll keep it as a locally maintained branch for now.
Or you could consider using the ssl branch where all this stuff already resides, without the hassle to maintain your own.. > How is squid-3 coming along? I am still bogged down in Squid-2.5 maintenance and forward-porting of 2.5 changes to Squid-3, and francly has not been able to look too closely at Squid-3 beyond what is required to forward port 2.5 stuff.. > Has anyone tackled the range request problems? > I might have another crack at fixing up Robert's stmem rewrite. You are more than welcome. Regards Henrik
