On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 08:59, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 01:11, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > One small request to make the future a little brighter. In Squid-3 we have > > already started adding support for concurrency in the helper protocols by > > prefixing each query with a query/session identifier (0 - max concurrency > > level defined for the helper), and the helper is free to answer the > > received queries in any order it likes. It would be great if you could > > look into how well this can be supported by Samba ntlm_auth to allow the > > scheme to scale in bigger installations. > > Can you give me details of the exact protocol you intend to use? Inside > ntlm_auth it should be trivial, I just keep separate state machines in a > lookup tree. Actually, now I re-read this, I think know what you you mean: 0 YR ........ 1 YR ...... 1 TT ######### 1 KK ...... Is there are 'shutdown' command? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
