On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 00:27 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Robert Collins wrote: > > > transparent has very specific meaning in rfc2616, I really don't think > > we should refer to transparent for anything other than that. > > Agreed > > Didn't I convince everyone to use interception the last time this came up? > Must have forgotten myself in that list of people to convince... ;-)
lol :) Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
