On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
That's a position I can respect. However, it just seems a little at odds with the restrictions on WebDAV (where we have to list all the HTTP methods we want to cross the proxy).
The WebDAV thing is due to a design error in Squid, not by intention.
Does the odd response code not cause Squid problems internally, like what 'box' to put the response in (cache-able, not cache-able, etc)?
Nope. Everything unknown goes into the not cache-able bucket..
Regards Henrik
