Hi Henrik,
At 14.44 10/03/2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
I would not require all the 2.5 patches.
Not all the patches, but for me any major functionality improvement like NTLM negotiate are mandatory.
The difference between NTLM without challenge reuse and SPNEGO is minimal. What I did in the 2.5 branch was that I implemented SPNEGO, then translated it back to NTLM wiht a search/replace of Negotiate to NTLM and trivial changes in the helper format and removed the SPNEGO specific response header function.
A diffstat between the two files gives 21 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-), in a file of 750 lines (SPNEGO)..
Ok, I was thinking that the changes would be bigger, so the target for SPNEGO support could be PRE4 ?
Regards
Guido
- ======================================================== Guido Serassio Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
