On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:22:53 +0200 (CEST)
Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Evgeny Kotsuba wrote:
And were is logic ?
requesting client said that Squid MUST NOT use a cached copy
Which is why there was not a cache hit. The client request forbits
this being a cache hit, redirected or not.
Squid config said that Squid MUST REDIRECT this URL
Yes?
If we must do as requesting client said, than why we ever
redirect it ?
I don't get what you see as a conflict.
If you see that the redirection did not happen then there is a
problem. But the reason why this was not a cache hit is because the
client explicitly forbids the cache to be used to server this
request.
You say as real communist if change "client" to "communist party" in
"client explicitly forbids" ;-)
Well. If "client explicitly forbids the cache to be used to server
this request." then why we have TCP_REFRESH_HIT for this request ?
SY,
Evgeny Kotsuba
