----- Original Message ----- From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steven Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 2:43 PM
Subject: RE: problems with the squid-2.5 connection pinning

ons 2006-04-19 klockan 07:38 +0800 skrev Steven Wilton:

When I was sending the "Connection: Proxy-support" header, IE only sent the
initial request, and never actually tried to complete the NTLM
authentication handshake. Removing this header made everything work again.

Odd..

I still have the "Proxy-Support: Session-Based-Authentication" header (as
specified in the document fragment that you posted to the list).  I'm not
sure if that makes any difference for child proxies, and IE works both with
and without this header.


The reason to this header is child proxies not having support for this
kind of connections. By having it in the Connection header such child
proxies won't forward the header to it's clients.


Hmm.. are you running transparent interception? If so then none of this
applies. The header is only relevant on proxied connections, not
intercepted connections.

Yes, I am running transparent interception. Are both these headers only relevant for non-transparent connections? If so, I can enable/disable them depending on which acceleration options are enabled.

regards

Steven

Reply via email to