mån 2006-09-04 klockan 00:11 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006, Robert Collins wrote: > > I'd like to raise the STL again as an option for squid3 rather than > > NIH'ing a whole bunch of core infrastructure. > > Its cool. The STL looks nice. The really trippy thing will be: > > * will it affect performance? > * how much will it cut the current codebase down by? > * if they're at odds; which is more important? > > And: > > * can it wait for after -3? :) > > My suggestion is to wait until -3 is released, then create an "STL" SF > branch and nut out the code to incorporate STL. We can then compare > codebase clarity, performance and portability.
Same here, on all points above. I say this is defenitely 3.1 material. Please don't do this in 3.0. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
