I'm working in squid2.6.stables2. Before that, I used squid2.5.stable10. 
Because the
epoll was used in squid2.6, which improves the squid performance very much, I 
updated
it to 2.6 version. Since update to 2.6, my one squid can handle 2,500 
http-request/sec.
Since you've completed the "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" part for squid2.6, I 
think 
publishing it in 2.6 is very useful. The squid3.0 do not yet offer a stable 
version for use,
so this is very senseful for the users. Don't you think so?
Regards
zsx
2006.10.17

----- 原始邮件 ----
发件人: Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
收件人: 树新 郑 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
抄送: squid dev <[email protected]>
已发送: 2006/10/17(周二), 上午6:07:11
主题: Re: hi, nice to meet you

mån 2006-10-16 klockan 13:00 +0800 skrev 树新 郑:
> I've been studying the squid codes for about six moths. Oh, yes, this is also
> my job to use squid for accelerating the web site. I'm now completing the
> "Transfer-Encoding" of HTTP1.1 which is used to help supporting HTTP-ZIP
> transfering(the backend web servers are all MS-IIS, which have supported
> compressing web-page.).

Which Squid version are you working in?

I have that done for 2.6 to the level that Squid can dechunk chunked
responses from servers for the exact same reasons. Hasn't published it
yet as I planned to port it to Squid-3 first.

Regards
Henrik





                
___________________________________________________________ 
雅虎免费邮箱-3.5G容量,20M附件 
http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to