On fre, 2007-08-10 at 15:53 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> I've altered this one so the two method declarations actually use the same
> name for their param type. Is there a reason for so many this type of
> typedef being kept in Squid3 (Squid2 I understand)?

There is no need for typedefs of classes in Squid-3. Feel free to kill
any such use.

Regards
Henrik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to