On lör, 2007-09-08 at 07:53 +0200, Pierangelo Masarati wrote: > I think you don't need to burn your brains too much on this point. > Figuring the perfect API out of the blue could mean spend a lot of > energies on something that would eventually freeze anyway, and if one > really needs a feature that was introduced few hours before, he won't > complain if minimal adjustments are required for a while (he'll probably > have more issues within his own plugin). Having said this, your point > definitely makes sense, and should drive the design, but without > excessive concern.
Yes, and is why I say reasonably in shape. > > but for the goal of spliting Squid in loadable objects all under our > > control then it's not so important and just 'b' suffices to get it done. > > Well, I believe it's a pity to hide this feature. Modularity and > extensibility often represent a winning point in software, as someone > with special needs will always stump in. Yes, but modularity without good boundaries just gets messy. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
