> On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 08:42 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > >> > Small preview: >> > http://squid.treenet.co.nz/features.dyn >> > >> > The details are possibly inaccurate right now. >> >> How about doing this in wiki, to ease updates? No strong opinion here -- >> just a thought... > > I agree with you suggestion. But at the same time, I also think it's > Amos' call. >
It's a good idea. I was worried about the long-term maintenance. I just don't know if the wiki can do the fancy table form (yet). I'm hoping this new wiki template I keep hearing about will be able to make it look like my slick demo one. Talking myself into doing it that way it appears there is already a bare Faetures page in the wiki. I'm getting a holistic vision now that looks good at first glance: Alexs' RoadMaps linking to /Features/X pages for features planned. This chart (at /Features) linking to /Features/X pages for features done/experimental. What do you all think? Amos