> On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 08:42 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
>> > Small preview:
>> >     http://squid.treenet.co.nz/features.dyn
>> >
>> > The details are possibly inaccurate right now.
>>
>> How about doing this in wiki, to ease updates? No strong opinion here --
>> just a thought...
>
> I agree with you suggestion. But at the same time, I also think it's
> Amos' call.
>

It's a good idea. I was worried about the long-term maintenance. I just
don't know if the wiki can do the fancy table form (yet). I'm hoping this
new wiki template I keep hearing about will be able to make it look like
my slick demo one.

Talking myself into doing it that way it appears there is already a bare
Faetures page in the wiki. I'm getting a holistic vision now that looks
good at first glance:

Alexs' RoadMaps linking to /Features/X pages for features planned.
This chart (at /Features) linking to /Features/X pages for features
done/experimental.

What do you all think?

Amos


Reply via email to