> On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 01:33 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> - * '''Developer''': ["Henrik Nordström"] >> + * '''Developer''': ["Henrik Nordström"], others welcome > > I suspect my "Developer" label may have an _unintended_ assumption that > others are not welcome to work on the feature that already has a > developer. This may cause changes like the one sampled above. > > I do believe that each feature on the TODO list (and many on the Wish > List) should have a single person responsible for orchestrating the > required work, but I do not want to imply that others are not welcome. > > Eventually, we may be able to extract people names from the feature > tables and remind them of their responsibilities or award them for their > work. Having a formal contact name would help with that automation as > well. > > Should we rename the "Developer" field into "Point-of-contact", > "Coordinator", or (horror!) "Manager"? Any better ideas? >
Co-Ordinator? Architect? chief contact? adjutant 'Garggleblaster'? ;-) 'Developer Contact' or 'Point of Contact' seems good to me. Amos
