On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:53 +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 20:17 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > > > > To support loadable modules, we may need to alter Squid sources layout > > or installation procedure. This email discusses the problem and four > > possible solutions. Please review and suggest the best path forward. > > To be portable, modules cannot use anything defined in 'squid' - we must > have a libsquid, which contains all symbols modules need. This shapes > the problem space quite definitively.
Yes, there will be libsquid, of course. Care to be more specific about what that means for how the sources are structured and/or installed? Thank you, Alex.
