> > On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote: > >> Could you make that 'USE_ESI' instead? that seems to be a defacto >> standard >> within squid for enabling components. Easier to keep things consistent. > > I could make it USE_SQUID_ESI if you like. > > I'm still concerned that "USE_ESI" is too generic and likely to be > chosen by some other project or operating system that uses an ESI > acronym. >
Seems slightly messier, but I see your point, and it will do. Amos
