On Wed, Dec 19, 2007, Tony Dodd wrote: > I've been running 2.6 for a while; and currently testing 2.HEAD & > 3.0STABLE1 on two machines. I've dropped a bugzilla for this, along > with a patch to modify the functionality to include http_port within the > carp hashing code. It enables a squid config option of 'carp_hash_port > on/off': http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2153
Ok cool. Now, the techie questions: * according to the draft, the port isn't used as part of the hash, is this right? * is just adding the port to the hash the "right way" of doing it? (its a hash, so you want to create even distributions..) * do people have a problem with this going into squid, with relevant documentation being written about how CARP has been "extended" like this? Adrian
