On Wed, Jan 16, 2008, Gonzalo Arana wrote: > Why not tproxy4? Unless I am mistaken, latest linux kernel tproxy patch > does not require the use of capabilities. Have a look at:
Because thats what we've got. > http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2129 > > I'll upload an up to date patch to the bug. Ideally what I'd like to see is all of the transparency stuff properly abstracted out. Squid-3 somewhat does this but only for the standard server-spoofing stuff. This way we can support tproxy2, tproxy4, and the FreeBSD stuff I've got in a tree here. Adrian
