On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 08:24 +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > So far I've heard of 3 devs trying the bzr tree, main concern has been > 'high' memory use (80MB) during initial pull, and that 1.0 is not all > that wide spread in stable distribution releases. > > I'd like to get feedback (or an explicit 'its fine') from hno, alex and > duane specifically before I suggest that we have consensus and are ready > to set a date for making CVS readonly and doing a final conversion.
IMHO, we should wait until bzr 1.x is widely spread and, hence, better tested and documented. With folks pushing for Squid 3.1 release soon and a few large branches not integrated yet, I would rather not spend time on learning a new VCS and struggling with relatively immature software. Thank you, Alex.
