On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 11:31 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > ... making access to the int value an explicit call to value() instead > of silent conversion.
How about id() instead of value()? > But as usual I'm not expecting anyone but me will go near the code > until its already in HEAD. :-( Hey, I did look at your changes or we would not have this conversation :-). Thanks, Alex.
