Thanks, I'll try that out.
I can see henrik's point; this *could* be solved by improving the
documentation (and in any case, it needs it). However, I tend to like
what I think this patch is going to do; it's the least surprising thing.
Cheers,
On 03/02/2008, at 6:55 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008, Mark Nottingham wrote:
Short version: When an accelerator, Squid tends to omit the port
number from its idea of what the request-URI is. This screws up
logging, helpers, acls, etc.
See:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2192
Try:
http://www.creative.net.au/diffs/20080203-squid2-default-accel-port.diff
=completely= untested!
Adrian
--
Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
