On tor, 2008-05-08 at 08:35 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > I am not sure this is the same topic, but I have already raised doubts > (on the wiki and in the bug report) that we should extend the > Squid-specific helper interface significantly beyond its current > relatively simple state. I still believe it is worth discussing whether > more complex uses should be routed through ICAP or eCAP instead of > slowly inventing yet another complicated and poorly maintained traffic > adaptation interface.
I think Mark is talking about the store url rewriter. It's a cache maintenance function, not really modifying the request/response in any manner, and I don't see how to fit that in ICAP or even the goals of eCAP. But it's possible eCAP may grow in future to include such things.. Regards Henrik
