Re: RFC2616 vs negative_ttl

[Mark Nottingham]

See also:
  http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1917


On 29/05/2008, at 12:31 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:

http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2364

The default setting of negative_ttl is an HTTP/1.1 violation. Do we have

any good reasons not to make it default to zero (non-cached)?

--
Mark Nottingham       [EMAIL PROTECTED]