Amos Jeffries wrote:
Unfortunatelly it did not.
2008/05/20 21:23:43| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 97 to
192.168.1.177:6013: (98) Address already in use
2008/05/20 21:23:43| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
in use
2008/05/20 21:23:44| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 95 to
192.168.1.177:6013: (98) Address already in use
2008/05/20 21:23:44| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
in use
2008/05/20 21:23:44| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 95 to
192.168.1.177:6013: (98) Address already in use
2008/05/20 21:23:44| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
in use
2008/05/20 21:23:44| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 97 to
192.168.1.177:6013: (98) Address already in use
2008/05/20 21:23:44| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
in use
2008/05/20 21:23:45| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 101 to
192.168.1.177:6013: (98) Address already in use
2008/05/20 21:23:45| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
in use
2008/05/20 21:24:10| IPInterception.cc(136) NetfilterInterception: NF
getsockopt(SO_ORIGINAL_DST) failed: (11) Resource temporarily
unavailable
2008/05/20 21:24:10| IPInterception.cc(169) NetfilterTransparent: NF
getsockopt(IP_TRANSPARENT) failed: (92) Protocol not available
2008/05/20 21:24:39| IdleConnList::removeFD: FD 78 NOT FOUND!
2008/05/20 21:25:46| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 30 to
192.168.1.177:3976: (98) Address already in use
2008/05/20 21:25:46| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
in use
2008/05/20 21:25:47| IPInterception.cc(136) NetfilterInterception: NF
getsockopt(SO_ORIGINAL_DST) failed: (11) Resource temporarily
unavailable
2008/05/20 21:25:47| IPInterception.cc(169) NetfilterTransparent: NF
getsockopt(IP_TRANSPARENT) failed: (92) Protocol not available
2008/05/20 21:25:53| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 35 to
192.168.1.177:3976: (98) Address already in use
2008/05/20 21:25:53| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
in use
2008/05/20 21:25:59| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 31 to
192.168.1.177:3977: (98) Address already in use
2008/05/20 21:25:59| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
in use
2008/5/20 Anton VG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Will try it now... already compiling.
Doh! I see the flaw in my thinking. That won't work when the new address
is not found.
I've just committed a better debug booster in revision 9002. It now shows
the output of each lookup at debug level 85,9.
I think we are going to need a trace of fd_table[fd] and the
NetfilterTransparent(...) parameters when those IP_TRANSPARENT errors are
happening.
And a backtrace when the bind error is displayed. I really don't think the
port should be set on those outgoing binds. But finding the right place to
suppress it is tricky.
Hi, sorry I let this drop.
Are you still available for testing? Any progress on the above questions?
Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE1 or 3.0.STABLE6
