On ons, 2008-06-11 at 13:14 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On ons, 2008-06-11 at 17:48 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Subject says it all - open, read and unlink are async, but write and close > > aren't. > > Why is at least write not async? > > Simply because when testing on Linux they very rarely block, with the fs > buffers absorbing them fully as long as you don't run too short on > memory.
Oh, forgot to say that there is #define's in store_asyncufs.h tuning this. But the non-default settings hasn't been tested in a very very long time.. (2000 timeframe) Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
