On tor, 2008-07-03 at 23:39 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: > My future plans there involve more standards compliance, which may make > things harder for people if there are two code versions to look at. The > upcoming compat changes from 3.2+ may also impact as non-portable back > to Squid-2.
The bigger reason NOT to drop the tools from Squid-2 imho.. The main goal is forward, not backward. I do not mind at all seeing changes in the Squid-3 version of the tools not getting backported to Squid-2. As I see it there is two choices: a) Split the tools out completely, make them live their own life outside of the main Squid repository. b) Keep as-is. My favorite is 'b'. The goal is after all that Squid-2 should slow down as Squid-3 picks up speed. REgards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
