Adrian Chadd wrote:
2008/7/8 Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It's too early to say if that will result in an immediate 2.8 release.
Depends on what you have done.
So yes, you are more than welcome to split cacheboy up in reviewable
changes and submit them for merge. Perhaps beginning with an high level
description of your goals (at code level) for this round of merges.
I wouldn't expect it to be an immediate Squid-2.8 release but I'd
first like some discussion about what would constitute enough.
The high level goal here is to shuffle code around into
mostly-seperate functional units in preparation for further work.
The problem is that I don't really see the point in shuffling things
back into Squid-2 if the mostly-stated project direction is elsewhere.
Hmm, I'm interested in seeing your code shuffling go in. If only to
measure it against the shuffling done/needed to modularize the same
things in 3.x. Your changes are after all, still currently duplicating
the cleanups shuffling in 3.x but in a C way.
As Mark said earlier, its useless making a full formal release if users
can't get a visible improvement out of it. BUT, shuffling that organises
things is usually far better than leaving it a mess. Even if it means
the 2.8 change is grows larger waiting for the visible bit.
Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE3 or 3.0.STABLE7
