Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On mån, 2008-07-14 at 03:01 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I brought this up a while ago with a timeline update request for Alex,
and we have had no response from him in the duration. I assume that
means he is too busy on other business to complete the three major
features, well overdue, on the TODO list under his name.
So, votes for releasing 3.1.PRE1 as soon as possible with the current
done list of features?
+1, but you know that from the maintenance algorithm I proposed
earlier..
But still a bit worried about the asynccall effects.. I don't think PRE1
is suitable until those is better understood.
I thought you and Alex had thrashed that all out to understanding weeks
back? At least as far as I followed the thread it all made sense.
Whats left in your mind as unsorted?
From a user perspective 3.1 is stable enough for uses and testing.
Thats why I'm proposing a PRE. I think the last few bugs and any Async
side-effects we have not found yet can be worked out in a few
PRE-cycles. As long as its started before any more big features go in to
muddle things up again.
Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE3 or 3.0.STABLE7
