On lör, 2008-08-16 at 02:16 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Henrik, Guido;
> 
>    The parser in 3.0 is just different enough from 3.1 for me to be 
> unsure whether the behavior would be the same. Does this need to be 
> back-ported?

The 3.0 parser looks fine to me. It was just HEAD that was twisted..

Regards
Henrik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to