On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 10:07 +0200, Kinkie wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So far this is only a 1 minute chat between Adrian and myself, but I think > > its worthwhile doing and we all need to discuss at least. > > > > Issue: theres a lot of obsolete text in the FAQ. > > > > Adrians (probably joking): 'chuck it and start again'. > > Amos: 'no, chuck everything only relevant for 2.5 and earlier, re-evaluate > > based on whats left' > > I'd go for the latter: the FAQ is _huge_.
Folks are still using 2.5 so we should at least archive the old FAQ if things get deleted. Deleting the whole thing is not a good option, IMO, but it is a lot of work to review and cleanup each item. Perhaps we can have two indexes into the same FAQ: one index links to reviewed and reasonable accurate/fresh entries only. The other links to all (or other?) entries. Both can be built automatically if we add a tag to fresh/reviewed FAQ entries. HTH, Alex.
