On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Guido Serassio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > At 10.31 25/08/2008, Kinkie wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Guido Serassio >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hi Amos, Kinkie, >> > >> > At 01.52 25/08/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> >> >> >> > It should be a safe enough bet that any C++ compiler can handle >> >> > STDC-style varargs. >> >> > This patch removes all the (mostly spaghetti) code which used to >> >> > handle >> >> > K&R-style varargs calls. >> >> > >> >> > Kinkie >> >> > >> >> >> >> The catch here is that .c files are not guaranteed to be built with a >> >> C++ >> >> compiler. This will need wide testing. >> > >> > On Visual Studio .c files MUST be compiled in "C" mode. Building in C++ >> > mode >> > will broke the link process cause the Visual Studio C++ function >> > decoration >> >> Sure, that's no problem and I'm not suggesting we change that. >> The question is: does Visual Studio in C mode handle STDC-style >> varargs declarations?If I sent you a windows-line-terminated tarball of >> the sources with >> patch, would you be willing to test-run it? > > This test currently cannot be done: Squid-3 HEAD is already broken on Visual > Studio since 2 - 3 months .... :-( > >> Or alternatively, could I borrow a vmware image of a windows system >> with the dev-stack to test it out? > > I have already considered such solution: it will be very useful to have a > development VM available somewhere. > > But there is a problem: > Software licenses for Microsoft products.
Yup.. I was hoping you could extend to us your MSDN license, but probably it's not doable. Do we have any contactperson within Microsoft to try and ask for free licenses? -- /kinkie
