On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Alex Rousskov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:13 +0200, Kinkie wrote: > >> I also take your comment as an encouragement to keep on working with >> SBuf. If that's not the case, please stop me now, as while I have some >> time to devote to squid, time is still too precious a resource to >> waste it fruitlessly. > > I encourage you to select Squid projects that match your interests and > expertise the best. As for the String project, which you have already > selected and invested in, I hope you will find a way to lovingly > implement valid recommendations, even when you feel that your design > choices are superior. >
[...] > That's exactly the problem in a project like String. See above for my > suggestions on how to bring the cost of this project down to an > acceptable level. So be it; I'll try to follow the suggestions you've given to me to the best of my ability. For those where I can't see a clean solution (SBuf meddling with SBufStore and related visibility issues, SBuf/String dualism and isNull() being the clearest examples), I'll ask you to show me a sample alternate interface and code stubs AFTER 3.1 has branched. I have plenty to do without going into those anyways... Thanks -- /kinkie
