On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 09:24 +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 13:43 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > > > > I can probably fix it myself, but it would help a lot if somebody > > could > > document (briefly!) the overall purpose of deferred reads and the > > exact > > purposes of these two nearly identical methods (one brief description > > for each, please): > > From memory... > > > DeferredReadManager::kickReads(int const count) > > do up to count reads that have been deferred > > > DeferredReadManager::flushReads() > > do all reads
Is the order in which reads are "done" or "kicked" important? Does it have to be FIFO? Thanks, Alex.
