On lör, 2008-10-04 at 19:15 +0200, Kinkie wrote: > ...which is exactly what I was suggesting at the beginning of this thread. > For rproxy scenarios, global_internal_static should cover the cases > Mark is worried about. > The only doubt I may have is how to best express access control (the > current implementation is IMVHO kludgy).
To fit with the rest there should be an acl matching the cachemgr action. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
