On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 14:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > > > > IMO, if a user explicitly requested feature Foo and Foo cannot be > > supported, we should fail rather than ignore the user request.
I completely agree with this. The usual behaviour I see that works well is: no-parameter supplied: Feature enables if possible --without | --disable: Feature does not enable and does not probe for dependencies --with | --enable: Feature enables and probes for dependencies, any missing dependencies are fatal. -Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
