On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 09:01 +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 13:20 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > > > > Should we dump all ACL* and excternal_acl.* sources to acl/? Or should > > some of the protocol or feature-specific ACL sources live where those > > sources live? For example, should ICAP-related ACLs live in acl/ or > > adaptation/icap/? > > > > Another question is whether the common ACL directory should be named > > acl > > or acls. The latter seems more appropriate if we are going to dump > > many > > ACLs there and not just the base type. > > I would like: > - feature specific acls with the feature > - the base type and generic support - the framework if you will - in > the main source directory > - all the non-feature-specific acl implementations in acls/
There will be virtually no sources in "main source directory", I hope (the whole idea for this project is to classify and segregate sources into more manageable pieces). On the other hand, we could place the ACL framework sources in acl/ and specific non-feature ACLs in acls/. Would that be good enough? Cheers, Alex.
