On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 12:17 +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: > The functionality? Very much so; I've been thinking about adding this > sort of thing for a while. Very useful if you're running an accelerator.
No, a rewrite of the approach - seems to me that a functional version many things support >> a new version that few things support. That said, I did have one concern - I think its clearer to say: 'surrogates use this header, clients get the original cache-control', than to say: 'surrogates use cache-control, and if there is a header X they replace cache-control with X'. The latter will be harder to debug by network traces I think. -Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
