On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:47:50 +1200, Amos Jeffries <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:04:06 +1000, Robert Collins
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 19:13 +0700, Jeroen Vermeulen wrote:
>>> Hi Robert,
>>> 
>>> I'm reviewing the translation template "errors/errpages.pot" you 
>>> uploaded to Squid.
>> 
>> Actually, *I* didn't upload it. I've cc'd the squid developers list, I'm
>> sure one of the other developers, probably Amos, did. I filed a bug a
>> couple of weeks back about launchpad being confused as to who did the
>> upload.
> 
> Yes it was me. I've been annoyed by that upload issue.
> It's happening for the .po as well, attributing the translator changes to
> committer despite the .po headers.
> 
>> 
>>> There is already a template "errors/dictionary.pot" in that directory. 
>>> At first glance I'd say your upload is probably meant to be an update
of
> 
>>> that template, but of course Launchpad doesn't want to make that leap 
>>> and potentially wreak havoc.
>>> 
>>> We heartily recommend not having more than one template in a directory.

>>>   All in all my best guess is that this is an update for 
>>> errors/dictionary.pot.  To get the uploads approved automatically you'd

>>> need to use exactly the same filename.  Assuming that this is indeed an

>>> update, would you like me to rename the "dictionary" template, so that 
>>> future uploads of errors/errpages.pot will go in automatically (but 
>>> uploads of errors/dictionary.pot won't)?
> 
> Yes please. This is a case of renaming the existing .pot to fix a
developer
> design error.
> We have had no issue with automatic updates of the .pot content, nor with
> the automatic addition of new .pot from bzr sources. Those are both
working
> wonderfully.
> 
>>> 
>>> BTW auto-approval is a lot more aggressive for imports from bzr 
>>> branches.  So you may be interested in setting up direct import from
the
> 
>>> source tree.  There may be some initial confusion if paths differ, but 
>>> after that it'll go more smoothly.
>> 
>> I think thats a good idea, so we'll probably do that. 
>> 
>> -Rob
> 
> Besides the attribution errors we are not having any issues with the
> regular translation events. I was kind of expecting this one to throw up
a
> manual check. It's an exception to the process and won't be happening
> regularly.

That said, I've just had to shuffle the manuals.pot and manualpo/* to
another directory as well.

Amos

Reply via email to