> Besides, it is probably an HTTP violation to forward trailing garbage > anyway, unless we switch to some kind of "tunneling mode" and become a > TCP proxy, but then you get problems with message smuggling and such. > > Do you think this change should go in?
Trunk and 3.1, I think so, 3.0 I'm uncertain. If the time allows, maybe protecting it with a fast-acl-backed selector (defaulting to 'apply to all') would be the most flexible solution, allowing (especially rproxy) administrators to fine-tune the behaviour. -- /kinkie