lör 2009-09-26 klockan 18:37 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > Something seems a bit weird to me there... > > (c) being harmless race condition?
It is harmless, the only ill effect is that the swap file is opened when it does not need to be, just as happens if the request had arrived a few ms before. clients starting when an object is not fully in memory always opens the disk object to be sure they can get the whole response, even if it most times do not need to read anything from that on-disk object. > Surely its only harmless if we do (b) by changing the assert to a > self-fix action? The self-fix is already there in that the actual data will all be copied from memory. It's just that not all data was in memory when the request started (store client created) but then when doCopy was called the first time it was. Or at least that's my assumption on what has happened. To know for sure the object needs to be analyzed extracting expected size and min & max in-memory to rule out that it's not an object that has got marked erroneous as in-memory. But I am pretty sure my guess is right. Regards Henrik
