On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:04:04 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > ons 2009-10-28 klockan 12:04 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries: > >> * That should have been --with-cap2 right? same as all the others >> ('lib' >> being redundant and libcap2 being the official name for it as differs >> from >> libcap and libcap-ng). > > I disagree there. > > The official name of libcap-x.y is libcap, not cap or cap2. Source level > API of libcap-1.x and libcap-2.x is the same, except that 2.x provides > more functions and is not binary compatible with 1.x applications. It's > a linear line of development from the same author. > > "all the others" is a very broad statement. We only have two other > --with-<somelib> and it's --with-dl and --with-openssl. > > Official name of openssl is openssl, not libssl as Debian likes to call > it.. > > and dl do not really have a name of it's own, and is only known as -ldl > to most. And can probably go away now that we have libtool adding > similar tests..
Hmm. Okay. Checking... fubar. Not sure where I got that idea. I've fully buggered the docs on libexpat and libxml2. Fixing. Amos
