On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 01:19 +0100, Kinkie wrote: > > And because the motivation is missing, I'm left asking 'why?' Untested > > code is broken code, so this really can't be the right answer. > > Ok, I'll be more detailed in the future. > As for this case: the autoconf environment is pretty messy in > "non-canonicalized" environments such as Solaris. In particular, the C > tests require linking against libstdc++, which causes two kind of > issues: finding it (there's at least 6 of the buggers in the test > zone), and finding the one with the right ABI (gcc/sunstudio cc). > Since we're not using the C interface anyways, might as well skip the checks.
I'd much rather you delete code that isn't being tested. -Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
