On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 10:40 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 03/25/2010 10:06 AM, Kinkie wrote: > > I've noticed that the bzr repository for trunk is based on an > > ancient "pack-0.92" repo format. > > After a few emails with Robert his recommendation is to upgrade the > > repo format to format 2a . > > Does anyone see any reason why this should not be done? > > Has Robert promised no bad side-effects?
Everyone will *need* bzr 2.0.x, or newer. (2.1.0 recommended, naturally). bzr has moved to a micro-release every month, so 2.0.0 is now 7 months old. 2a is much more compact on disk, and faster across the board. But everyone will need to upgrade their own repositories, which can take a bit of time (or delete them and pull anew). Cheers, Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
