Now <http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956>.
Can anyone else reproduce this? I'm a bit surprised it hasn't bitten someone else. On 16/02/2010, at 5:45 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > - it *does* hit VARY_REFRESH first > - threshold for the vary problem is much lower > - evident since (at least) Squid 2.7STABLE1 -- Mark Nottingham [email protected]
